A.O. Scott - film critic

Scott’s criticisms remind me of the no-bullshit reviews of Pauline Kael and Roger Ebert. Their perspectives on the history of film anchor their viewpoints.

Example: JOKER

“To be worth arguing about, a movie must first of all be interesting,” A.O. Scott writes. “It must have, if not a coherent point of view, at least a worked-out, thought-provoking set of themes, some kind of imaginative contact with the world as we know it. ‘Joker,’ an empty, foggy exercise in secondhand style and second-rate philosophizing, has none of that. Besotted with the notion of its own audacity — as if willful unpleasantness were a form of artistic courage — the film turns out to be afraid of its own shadow, or at least of the faintest shadow of any actual relevance.”

a79a1fb5-cada-43d7-b97f-c6864fa091e7.jpg

Black Mirror

This is one of those dark and sometimes funny, sometimes beautiful (Netflix) shows that hits its mark consistently - often highlighting some near technology gone awry.

blackmirror.jpg

a simple plan

Things I find helpful about this plan: people, color, rugs, plants and bikes - dimensions, therefore, are not as necessary.

kombinat-vienna-apartment-ab-layout.jpg